Introducing Hayley Martin: Why Culture is at the Heart of Our Executive Search Practice

A conversation with Hayley Martin, Executive Search Practice Lead at Lotus People


As Lotus People formally launches its Executive Search practice, we sat down with Hayley Martin to talk aboutwhat separates a great senior hire from a costly one, what mid-market businesses consistently get wrong, andwhy she chose to build this here.


After eight years in executive search, what is the most common mistake you see businesses making whenhiring at C-suite or Head of level?


There are a couple that come up again and again.


One of the biggest is not having a strong enough idea of what they actually want. It's okay for a search to evolveas you go, that's natural, but you need to start with clarity. What does this person need to achieve in the first 90to 180 days? What kind of culture do they need to reflect? What does the existing culture actually look like?


Another mistake is not ensuring the person you bring in is aligned with the board. Nothing creates more frictionthan when the board isn't aligned with what a new CEO or C-suite member is looking to do. That misalignmentcan filter down through the organisation and, before you know it, the whole business has been reshaped by onehire.


I also think the level of risk involved in getting a senior hire wrong isn't always fully appreciated. At the C-suite level, the financial, cultural and reputational impact can be significant. It's not just one role, it can influence strategy, board confidence and the direction of the business. The cost of getting it wrong at this level is fargreater than anywhere else in the organisation.



What is the difference between a great executive search process and an average one? And why does itmatter at the senior level?


A great search process is a partnership. You're aligned with your client the whole way through.


From the very first briefing, you're on the same page, and that briefing isn't a rushed call. It's typically aminimum of an hour and a half, sometimes longer, covering not just the role requirements but a thoroughunderstanding of the organisation. What have been the recent wins? What challenges have they faced? Whereare they looking to grow? As a search consultant, I need to understand all of that to bring forward people whoare genuinely aligned.


Communication is also critical at senior level. I would expect weekly updates with my client, talking throughwhat I've been doing, what I'm seeing in the market, who is interested, who isn't, and why. Those conversationsalso provide real market insight. It's not just about filling a role. It's about understanding how your brief islanding, whether salary expectations are aligned, and how your proposition compares to competitors. Thattransparency allows boards to make informed decisions rather than assumptions.


And at senior level, discretion is critical. Many searches are confidential, sometimes even internally. Protectingboth the client's and the candidate's reputation is a fundamental part of the process.




Why did you want to build this division at Lotus People specifically?


For me, like many people making a move, it was about culture. I wanted to join an organisation where I feltheard and valued, and that's exactly what I found.


The team at Lotus People are incredibly experienced, and the directors are genuinely focused on people first.That really resonated with me, because executive search is fundamentally about people. It's about the boardsand senior leaders looking for someone to join their team, and it's about the individuals considering their nextmove.


I also think Lotus People was in a strong position to introduce Executive Search. The brand already has trustedrelationships in the mid-market, strong networks across HR, finance and business support, and a reputation builton quality rather than volume. That gives us a solid foundation to build something premium and thoughtful,rather than transactional.


Joining an organisation that doesn't already have an executive search function also means we're not governed by"it's what we've always done." We're open-minded and able to build this properly, with fresh thinking andgenuine innovation.



What do you think mid-market Australian businesses get wrong about senior hiring compared to largecorporates?


Sometimes mid-market businesses don't have enough confidence in what they have to offer. They assume theywon't attract senior candidates from large corporates, but that isn't necessarily true.


If you can clearly articulate your culture and EVP, and demonstrate that senior leaders will have genuineinfluence and impact rather than just ticking a box, that's very attractive. Many senior leaders are activelylooking for the opportunity to shape something. Mid-market businesses can offer that in a way large corporatesoften can't.


The other common issue is not doing enough upfront research, not completing market mapping, notunderstanding salary benchmarks, not being clear on structure. You need to think through what you need fromthe position and how it supports future growth. The right hire should be able to deliver today and grow with theorganisation over time.



Hayley Martin leads Lotus People Executive Search, working with ambitious organisations across Australia toappoint senior and C-suite leaders. Her approach is grounded in cultural precision, stakeholder alignment and discretion.


To explore how Lotus People Executive Search can support your next leadership appointment, reach out toHayley directly at hayley.martin@lotuspeople.com.au.




Lotus People Executive Search |www.lotuspeople.com.au/executive-search


You may also like...

March 5, 2026
A natural next step for Lotus People - Lotus Executive Search , an organic evolution of work we've been doing for years, now delivered with the rigour, discretion, and partnership it deserves.  Leading this practice is Hayley Martin who brings over 20 years of executive search experience, including deep expertise in the not-for-profit sector, membership organisations, and corporate leadership appointments
By Michelle Barrett February 25, 2026
In the ever-evolving world of talent acquisition, reference checks remain a standard practice. However, I've recently asked my network a question: Is bringing two candidates to the reference check stage a fair and ethical practice? The overwhelming consensus from HR professionals, recruiters, and hiring managers is a resounding no . While companies might justify this approach to ensure they make the best hiring decision, the practice has significant drawbacks. The Candidate’s Perspective: False Hope and Strained Relationships For candidates, reference checks often represent the final hurdle before an offer. Being asked to provide references is a hopeful moment—only to discover later that they were simply a “backup” candidate. This leads to: False hope : The process feels misleading if references are strong, but the candidate still doesn’t secure the role due to a small deciding factor. Professional risk : Candidates hesitate to repeatedly ask the same referees for endorsements, fearing it may strain professional relationships or cast doubt on their credibility. Frustration and wasted time : Candidates invest considerable effort in securing references, only to walk away empty-handed. The Referee’s Burden: A Drain on Time and Goodwill Reference checks aren’t just a candidate inconvenience; they also affect referees—often senior professionals taking time out of their busy schedules. Many commenters noted: Referees have limited patience: If a former manager is repeatedly asked for references for the same person without a job offer, they may be reluctant to vouch for them in the future. - A one-sided burden : The hiring company benefits from this additional insight, but referees get little in return other than expecting a favour. The Hiring Manager’s Responsibility: Why This Practice Undermines Decision-Making Some employers argue that reference checks help finalise a tough decision between two equally qualified candidates. However, many experts push back against this rationale: Hiring decisions should be based on direct assessment, not external opinion : As one commenter put it, “You should never put the decision of who best to hire in the hands of someone you don’t know and doesn’t work for your business.” Reference checks are not selection tools : Traditionally, references are a due diligence step , not a deciding factor between multiple candidates. It’s an outdated practice : With many companies now limiting references to basic employment verification, the value of this process is already diminished. So, What’s the Alternative? If reference checks shouldn’t be used to choose between candidates, how should they be utilised?
By Michelle Barrett February 25, 2026
After my recent post about the distinct roles of HR and Talent Acquisition, it’s clear that this topic resonates with many professionals across industries. The comments highlighted not only the passion within the HR and TA community but also the ongoing challenges we face in bridging the understanding gap with business leaders. One theme that stood out was that it’s not just about defining the differences—it’s about evolving the conversation.
More Posts