Your Culture is Your Brand

I was talking to my friend on the weekend about how many people in Sydney are struggling in isolation with limited human connection. It got me thinking about what makes relationships truly thrive and the correlation with successful company cultures.


I often hear candidates say “I want to work in a positive culture” or “I want to work with an employer who is supportive”. When I hear this, I always dig deeper with them to really understand what this looks like, as a supportive or positive culture for one candidate will often mean something entirely different for another. E.g. a candidate may want to feel truly supported through ongoing training, mentoring and supervision whereas another candidate may view a supportive work environment as being provided with the autonomy to carry out their role each day.


My strongest relationships to date have existed on a foundation of shared core values with often different secondary values that can challenge one another. In my circle of friends, my best friend Cara is incredible at always being very open-minded. Being one of her core values, this often challenges the rest of the group to consider different perspectives and opinions.


Throughout my career, I have found that the most successful company cultures are able to clearly define their ‘must have core values’ and ‘nice to have secondary values’ and authentically live by these values every day. They make intentional and considered decisions to hire staff who truly embody their core values but who can also often bring unique additional values to the company that will enable it to be challenged and grow.


In my experience, identifying candidates whose values compliment a company culture can be found in a range of different industries, in the same way that we form strong relationships with many different types of people. I recruit for non-profit, healthcare, membership and education organisations and what I absolutely love about all of these industries is the commonality in some of their core values. Staff genuinely value authentic human connection, are driven by opportunities to help people and are passionate about contributing to a bigger purpose.


Culture fit has evolved significantly during COVID, with both clients and candidates now immensely valuing flexible ways of working and a work life balance. Now more than ever before, people are prioritising self-care, wellbeing and two-way respect in the workplace.


I always recruit with a true emphasis on culture fit, because I believe that you can train new skills but you cannot train innate traits and values. I have seen employers of choice continually commit to their set of core values. They aren’t just listed on their company website, they are evidently imbedded in their ways of working, throughout every level of the business. These values are truly tangible, throughout the hiring process and entire employee lifecycle.


Culture fit is a significant driver of success and growth in a company. It enables employees to truly thrive in their roles, it keeps them connected with the company and engaged with their goals.



Your culture is your brand.

You may also like...

March 5, 2026
A conversation with Hayley Martin, Executive Search Practice Lead at Lotus People As Lotus People formally launches its Executive Search practice, we sat down with Hayley Martin to talk about what separates a great senior hire from a costly one, what mid-market businesses consistently get wrong, and why she chose to build this here . 
March 5, 2026
A natural next step for Lotus People - Lotus Executive Search , an organic evolution of work we've been doing for years, now delivered with the rigour, discretion, and partnership it deserves.  Leading this practice is Hayley Martin who brings over 20 years of executive search experience, including deep expertise in the not-for-profit sector, membership organisations, and corporate leadership appointments
By Michelle Barrett February 25, 2026
In the ever-evolving world of talent acquisition, reference checks remain a standard practice. However, I've recently asked my network a question: Is bringing two candidates to the reference check stage a fair and ethical practice? The overwhelming consensus from HR professionals, recruiters, and hiring managers is a resounding no . While companies might justify this approach to ensure they make the best hiring decision, the practice has significant drawbacks. The Candidate’s Perspective: False Hope and Strained Relationships For candidates, reference checks often represent the final hurdle before an offer. Being asked to provide references is a hopeful moment—only to discover later that they were simply a “backup” candidate. This leads to: False hope : The process feels misleading if references are strong, but the candidate still doesn’t secure the role due to a small deciding factor. Professional risk : Candidates hesitate to repeatedly ask the same referees for endorsements, fearing it may strain professional relationships or cast doubt on their credibility. Frustration and wasted time : Candidates invest considerable effort in securing references, only to walk away empty-handed. The Referee’s Burden: A Drain on Time and Goodwill Reference checks aren’t just a candidate inconvenience; they also affect referees—often senior professionals taking time out of their busy schedules. Many commenters noted: Referees have limited patience: If a former manager is repeatedly asked for references for the same person without a job offer, they may be reluctant to vouch for them in the future. - A one-sided burden : The hiring company benefits from this additional insight, but referees get little in return other than expecting a favour. The Hiring Manager’s Responsibility: Why This Practice Undermines Decision-Making Some employers argue that reference checks help finalise a tough decision between two equally qualified candidates. However, many experts push back against this rationale: Hiring decisions should be based on direct assessment, not external opinion : As one commenter put it, “You should never put the decision of who best to hire in the hands of someone you don’t know and doesn’t work for your business.” Reference checks are not selection tools : Traditionally, references are a due diligence step , not a deciding factor between multiple candidates. It’s an outdated practice : With many companies now limiting references to basic employment verification, the value of this process is already diminished. So, What’s the Alternative? If reference checks shouldn’t be used to choose between candidates, how should they be utilised?
More Posts