Tips on how to secure your first role

I recently had the pleasure of delivering a CV workshop to a fantastic group of young adults who are participating in the Nourish program run by the fabulous OzHarvest. Aside from covering off some general “do’s and don’ts,” our main focus was on the question of what to do when you don’t have much experience.


It’s an issue everyone faces at the outset of their career: I need experience to get the job, but I need the job to get experience! We’ve all been there, and it can feel like an insurmountable problem.


When you’re a “junior” candidate (less than 2 years of work experience) you are competing against a large pool of candidates who all look very similar on paper. So how do you stand out from the crowd when you don’t have a long, relevant career history to fall back on?


Take care with your CV:


If you don’t have much to write about in your CV, the look, feel and formatting of your CV becomes even more important. Ensure your CV has consistent formatting, a professional font, an easy-to-read layout and no spelling or grammatical errors. If you have limited experience your CV probably only needs to be 1 – 2 pages.


Take advantage of the Cover Letter:


A good cover letter is a great way to stand out from the crowd, particularly when you are applying for entry level roles that don’t necessarily have a lot of strict pre-requisites. It’s an opportunity to demonstrate:


  • Your personality*
  • Your written communication skills
  • Your genuine interest in the company, industry, and role


Your cover letter only needs to be a page long, and should be tailored to the specific role and company you are applying for.
*Showcasing your personality is great, but be sure to keep it professional. I’ve seen some cover letters that were clearly intended to be humorous but which unfortunately came across as immature and unprofessional. This is best avoided!


Include extracurriculars:


If you are light on experience, you can highlight other activities. As an example, the Nourish crew had worked on OzHarvest’s massive CEO Cookoff event. This event saw them doing food prep and event support for an event serving 1,500 guests. This is no small feat and we talked through all of the skills and activities that were required to pull the event off; teamwork,

communication, food prep, problem solving, customer service… the list filled a white board!


Any voluntary, community, school or entrepreneurial activities you are involved in can be included in your CV to illustrate that you are self-motivated, hard-working and capable of contributing within a team.


Don’t get discouraged:


It can feel pretty depressing when you’re struggling to “get your foot in the door.” Resilience is absolutely crucial – expect to be rejected over and over and know that it’s not personal – you are competing against a large number of your peers and often up to 200 people will apply for 1 role.


Be proactive:


As a recruiter, I really shouldn’t say this – but cut out the middle man! If you have a “hot list” of the top 5 companies you want to work for, tell them! Reach out on the phone, via Linkedin or by emailing their careers, recruitment or HR team (these details are often freely available on company websites). Finding new staff is difficult – it takes time, energy and money that many companies would rather not spend. If you are proactive and reach out to them, you are saving them resources and doing the work for them. The worst thing they can say is “no,” but you just might get the break you’ve been looking for.

You may also like...

March 5, 2026
A conversation with Hayley Martin, Executive Search Practice Lead at Lotus People As Lotus People formally launches its Executive Search practice, we sat down with Hayley Martin to talk about what separates a great senior hire from a costly one, what mid-market businesses consistently get wrong, and why she chose to build this here . 
March 5, 2026
A natural next step for Lotus People - Lotus Executive Search , an organic evolution of work we've been doing for years, now delivered with the rigour, discretion, and partnership it deserves.  Leading this practice is Hayley Martin who brings over 20 years of executive search experience, including deep expertise in the not-for-profit sector, membership organisations, and corporate leadership appointments
By Michelle Barrett February 25, 2026
In the ever-evolving world of talent acquisition, reference checks remain a standard practice. However, I've recently asked my network a question: Is bringing two candidates to the reference check stage a fair and ethical practice? The overwhelming consensus from HR professionals, recruiters, and hiring managers is a resounding no . While companies might justify this approach to ensure they make the best hiring decision, the practice has significant drawbacks. The Candidate’s Perspective: False Hope and Strained Relationships For candidates, reference checks often represent the final hurdle before an offer. Being asked to provide references is a hopeful moment—only to discover later that they were simply a “backup” candidate. This leads to: False hope : The process feels misleading if references are strong, but the candidate still doesn’t secure the role due to a small deciding factor. Professional risk : Candidates hesitate to repeatedly ask the same referees for endorsements, fearing it may strain professional relationships or cast doubt on their credibility. Frustration and wasted time : Candidates invest considerable effort in securing references, only to walk away empty-handed. The Referee’s Burden: A Drain on Time and Goodwill Reference checks aren’t just a candidate inconvenience; they also affect referees—often senior professionals taking time out of their busy schedules. Many commenters noted: Referees have limited patience: If a former manager is repeatedly asked for references for the same person without a job offer, they may be reluctant to vouch for them in the future. - A one-sided burden : The hiring company benefits from this additional insight, but referees get little in return other than expecting a favour. The Hiring Manager’s Responsibility: Why This Practice Undermines Decision-Making Some employers argue that reference checks help finalise a tough decision between two equally qualified candidates. However, many experts push back against this rationale: Hiring decisions should be based on direct assessment, not external opinion : As one commenter put it, “You should never put the decision of who best to hire in the hands of someone you don’t know and doesn’t work for your business.” Reference checks are not selection tools : Traditionally, references are a due diligence step , not a deciding factor between multiple candidates. It’s an outdated practice : With many companies now limiting references to basic employment verification, the value of this process is already diminished. So, What’s the Alternative? If reference checks shouldn’t be used to choose between candidates, how should they be utilised?
More Posts